Apr 2026

YouTube and Cyando: when is a platform liable for pirated content?

CJEU C-682/18 and C-683/18 | 22 June 2021
"

Millions of videos are uploaded to online platforms every day. Some contain music, films or other protected creations without authorisation. Who is liable, the platform or the user? The CJEU’s answer redefined the rules of the internet.

Frank Peterson, a musician, and the publisher Elsevier discovered that their works were available without authorisation on YouTube and on a file-hosting platform, Cyando. They sought damages from the platforms.

The CJEU held that platforms do not themselves carry out a communication to the public if they play a neutral role, meaning they do not select, organise or promote the illegal content. In those circumstances, there is no direct liability.

However, platforms may lose their liability exemption if they fail to implement effective mechanisms to prevent re-uploading of illegal content, fail to act promptly upon right holder notices, or fail to make reasonable efforts to prevent access to unlawful content.

This accelerated the implementation of automated filtering systems, such as YouTube’s Content ID, and defined the minimum due-diligence standard for large platforms. Right holders now have a clearer legal framework for notices and takedown requests.

Online platforms are shielded from direct liability if they remain neutral and act quickly. Inaction after notice can generate liability.

Case Studies