Apr 2026

SEPs and FRAND licences: how the CJEU resolved the conflict in Huawei v ZTE

CJEU C-170/13 | 16 July 2015
"

When you own a patent essential to a global technological standard, your power is enormous, but it comes with responsibilities. Huawei v ZTE set the ground rules for one of the most heavily contested areas of IP law.

Huawei owned patents essential to the LTE (4G) standard and sued ZTE for infringement, seeking an injunction against the marketing of its products. The problem was that Huawei had previously committed to the standard-setting organisation to offer licences on FRAND terms, fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory.

Can an SEP holder block a competitor without first offering a FRAND licence? The CJEU answered through a balanced mechanism.

The proprietor must notify the infringement and make a FRAND licence offer. The alleged infringer must respond diligently. If negotiations fail because of the infringer’s conduct, an injunction becomes justified.

This decision structures SEP licence negotiations across the telecoms and electronics sectors. Companies manufacturing devices compatible with global standards such as Wi-Fi, 4G, 5G or Bluetooth operate within the legal framework established by this ruling.

An SEP holder cannot seek an injunction without first offering a FRAND licence. The negotiations follow a precise legal protocol.

Case Studies